- 3Threads
- 2Posts
- 2Threads
- 0Posts
- 0Threads
- 0Posts
- 4Threads
- 0Posts
Recent Discussions
Avatar 2 is an upcoming American epic science fiction film directed, produced, edited, and co-written by James Cameron
Avatar: The Way Of Water,Release date,Cast,Updates
produced by 20th Century Studios, Cameron, who had started in 2006 that he would like to make series to Avatar it has been a decade since Avatar smashed the record at the box office on July 31, 2017, it was declared that Weta Digital had started work on the Avatar series. Check out the art pieces of avatar2 won’t just return to Pandora — you’ll explore new parts of the world.
In the case when we think otherwise and consider the possible variants, we are ready for the next step. If it turned out that what we accept for
new value of hq and return to the original position: the value of the integral and the given step hq are calculated.
Initial conditions for applying the procedure:
Provided the step is broken everywhere, but hence does not follow that the comparison of the results of calculations with and any satisfying (8) gives a reliable guarantee of the accuracy of the result.
Task 2 (hireessaywriter.org academic system)Let's. Pick up constant Cs such that when approximate values and integral, are the same and will be the same, and the error is different from zero.
Hi,
I hope this question does not sound like "hey guys, I am feeling lazy, just tell me how to do it". I'm indeed spending hours of google-searching for papers, but I'm beginning to run in circles. Therfore I seek external hints.
In short: I've written a parser for a Java-like language which is expected to produce JVM bytecode.
As a second step, now I want to write the mapping into a semantic model, validate that model (type checking, scopes checking and so on).
A third step will be transforming the semantic model into JVM bytecode.
An additional requirement is that I want to implement the second and third step with formal methods.
So, to be more concise about what I want to achieve:
-Let S be my language (the one I am implementing).
-Let O be a model for OOP formal semantics (general enough, language-agnostic); let S(O) my language's formal semantics defined within O; and let JVM(O) JVM bytecode's formal semantics defined within O. Note that both S(O) and JVM(O) are defined within O.
-- [JVM bytecode -> JVM(O)] is injective, so it is reversable and I can transform models written in O into JVM bytecodes.
-- [S->S(O)] is a subfunction of [S->JVM(O)], so everything written in S source will have a meaning within JVM(O).
-Let S1 be a source program written in my language S.
Now, I am pursuing one or more frameworks that will assist me as much as possible in automatizing these three processes:
1) The formal sematics specification of my language S,
2) Writing and testing the compiler itself (including its formal verification),
3) Executing users' compilations (for a given source, generate and validate a semantics model and then a target bytecode model).
I have found frameworks (either theoretical and/or executable frameworks) that assist in each one of the steps, but I failed to find an out-of-the-box ready framework that I might use for 1, 2 and 3.
Do you happen to know one, or perhaps you can suggest a least resistance path (in terms of mandays) to implement one?
Every contribution will be appreciated!
David
PS: I am omitting the frameworks I have been playing with in order to first focus on the theoretical problem and make sure I am understood. Later on I can give implementation details.
Today we will consider quite popular question from people who think of being a programmer " does a programmer need to know mathematics?" Recently, this question is often in my email box and among private messages in social networks, so it's time to expand to answer.If you try tofind in Google whether the programmer needs mathematics, you will get both positive and negative answers. My younger brother is a programmer. When he was a student and began to work, he pay for statistics homework and get his marks. He sisn't have enouht time for it and did not consider it necessary to pay much attention to this subject. And for all his practical work as a web programmer, since the middle of 2012, he used the knowledge of higher mathematics 3-4 times. Without the regular use of knowledge of probability theory, which was necessary in these cases, had to raise the book and remember the forgotten theory.
The rest of his time he was programming and school mathematics was mostly enough. I will tell more, not all school mathematics was necessary to it. There were no projects where it was necessary to apply knowledge, for example, school geometry.
The main task of a programmer is to explain to a computer what to do in one of the programming languages. And for this higher mathematics is not necessary. The only obligatory subject of higher mathematics is mathematical logic. Without it it is impossible to build conditional expressions. And even it is necessary to know no more than 20%.
Elementary mathematics is necessary for all technical specialists. Even web designers to count and translate units, calculate percentages, etc.
What do you think about it?